What Revolution?
By José Reyes 2/11/2007
Revolution! The choice word used by Communist leaders and Communist sympathizers. The big hype I call it, a counterfeit dream, an empty train of thoughts full with a filthy odor of faulty propaganda, heading and nearly arriving to a station named "A Perfect Utopia". A fictional place, a state of mind that does not exist and never will exist. Why, we ask, because Karl Marx 
made it seem so simple to reach, so beautiful of a place where everyone is "totally" equal, where everyone is worth the same, such a beautiful place. I always think of this place, but again, who doesn't? I'm sure that everyone reading this article can come up with a setting where everyone is totally happy and totally equal, its not so hard to dream, but impossible to physically experience. For example, let's pretend that there is such a community, a community that has established a Perfect Utopia, where everyone is totally equal. I say within a few months after this perfect society is established, there will be a problem, it's inevitable. Before I continue my critique of Communism I will pause for a while and touch a little on the Communist Manifesto 
and what Marx tried to convey with this "Romantic" terror. I would also like to express to all the readers here, it is very important to know who you are fighting, what their beliefs are, even though you hate it, you must understand your enemy so you know what to expect and how to defend yourself. Marx wrote this manifesto with the intention to make everyone equal, his idea was to train everyone to work so everyone could pitch in, so everyone could help each other and eventually the concept of money would not have any value. A great idea but he ran into a big problem and acknowledged it, as "Human Nature" became a big obstacle in the way of his grand plan. "Human Nature" was contested by many thinkers of his time, human nature could not be changed, if one was accustomed to living the good life then it 
would be too difficult to change the individual and make that individual give up all that they had accumulated. On the other side of the spectrum if an individual was poor and never had any future, this system would be more appropriate for them. Marx also admitted that for this to really work in the beginning, there would have to be a force, an army, that would "make" things work. That's where Friedrich Engels comes into the conversation, for it was Marx and Engels who collaborated to write this manifesto. Engels sees the problem Marx runs into with Human Nature so he comes up with the concept of Socialism, where the people are allowed to own their own property and even have elections, 
but this is only in the beginning. Engels socialist idea is just to make the transition to Communism more smoother, by "Political Correctness" and steady gradual changes in governmental laws. In a nut shell this is how Communism and Socialism works, basically its a psychological trap, an illusion created to gain the power of physical control over the people, to the point where the populous become slaves. You could say a hard-line communist like the Castro Regime follows the Marxist view and Lula from Brazil is taking Engels' angle. As for Chavez, he is taking advise from Fidel so he can avoid the multiple failures the Castro regime has inflicted on the Cuban people. What kind of real advice can Fidel give and what kind of advice can anybody really give to this animal.
| Locke Hobbs Hegal Human Nature (Definitions and Concepts) Dictionary.com: 1.The psychological and social qualities that characterize humankind, esp. in contrast with other living things. 2.Sociology: the character of human conduct, generally regarded as produced by living in primary groups. M-W.com: the nature of humans; especially : the fundamental dispositions and traits of humans Important Contributors to Human Nature Note: (These are 3 contributors I found to be very important for this article) John Locke (Quote): "All mankind... being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions." Thomas Hobbes(Quote): "That a man be willing, when others are so too, as far forth as for peace and defense of himself he shall think it necessary, to lay down this right to all things; and be contented with so much liberty against other men, as he would allow other men against himself." Georg Wilhielm Friedrick Hegal (Quote): "Governments have never learned anything from history, or acted on principles deducted from it." These Philosophers had different opinions on Human Nature Read More about these Philosophers: Locke: Iep.utm.edu Hobbes: Iep.utm.edu Hegal: Iep.utm.edu
|
Human nature is the key, but can we change human nature? Reading and investigating the subject of human nature has convinced me more about the way Communism works and how ugly the future would be with
such a dominating and destructive system. By dissecting human nature the concept of individuality, freedom of speech and personal property kept surfacing and how important they are. Communism is geared to destroy all three of these characteristics, the essentials to live a happy, fruitful and prosperous life. Communist and Socialist have been trying to change human nature for hundreds of years and all they have achieved is the mental and physical breakdown of the human being. Take a good at all the countries that are ruled or have been ruled by a communist or socialist systems and all you see is misery mixed with slavery. For those who were able to withstand the horrific pressure put to them and revolted against the system, 
they have been executed or are just part of the millions that occupy and occupied prisons in Siberia, North Korea, Czecklosovakia, Poland, East Germany, Yugoslavia, China, Vietnam and Cuba. This is the "Revolution" that Commie leaders and Commie sympathizers are always reaching for, this is the excuse they create for their failure. The excuse used to maintain focus on a bogus future, meanwhile stealing your personal property and stripping everyone from all their liberties. "Do it for the Revolution", they roar with such confidence. What Revolution I ask you all? I guess their Revolution means changing Evolution.
These self proclaimed leaders are destroying Latin America and for what right reason can they do this? There is no right reason, they are just a bunch of jealous advantageous scavengers who are destroying 
their own people. Destroying all their hopes, their traditions and all their spiritual beliefs. The perfect example is Cuba, it is living proof. These leaders have no future in store for the people they "govern", no hope, all they can provide to their "citizens" are empty words and that futile cry of propaganda, the "Revolution". Thank god Democracy exists, imagine the future of the world with these maniacs. This is why Communism never works and never will work. Communism could be a very enticing way to brainwash mass amounts of people, especially those who have been govern by vicious dictators, it seems to be a perfect fit, you know an interim government until everybody regroups and get their heads together.
Sure! Then when the populous commit themselves to this "system" these leaders who they feel they could trust, will become dictators just like the others and proceed to enslave them all, psychologically and physically, that's the "Revolution". Let's take another look at Cuba. Yeah, join the Revolution, what Revolution? Let's check back with the perfect example, look at Cuba, 48 years and nothing! 11million people enslaved by a self destructive system called Communism, how would Marx feel about his "Perfect Utopia" now? I wish Marx was alive now so I could see him squirm out of this one. Communism works on paper my friends but you know it very well, it will never work on people.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario